AGP Picks
View all

Softstack clears Edel Finance’s futures backend security review

6 hours ago
Softstack clears Edel Finance’s futures backend security review
By AI, Created 13:02 UTC, Nov 11, 2026, AGP -

Softstack completed an independent penetration test of Edel Finance’s perpetual futures infrastructure and found 27 security issues, including two high-severity vulnerabilities that were remediated. The review covered APIs, authentication, trading workflows and AI-agent integrations, with no open findings left at the end of the engagement.

Why it matters: - Edel Finance is building programmable trading infrastructure for tokenized equities, so weaknesses in trading APIs, authentication or settlement systems could affect market access and operational resilience. - The assessment focused on a development environment, but it tested the controls that sit behind automated trading and AI-agent integrations. - Independent testing helps financial infrastructure teams find and fix issues before they reach production.

What happened: - softstack completed an owner-authorized, grey-box penetration test of Edel Finance’s perpetual futures backend infrastructure between Oct. 8 and Oct. 13, 2026. - softstack then conducted a remediation re-test on Oct. 17, 2026. - The review covered API services, authentication and authorization controls, trading operations, AI-agent integrations, and supporting infrastructure. - The assessment also examined REST APIs, WebSocket services, Model Context Protocol interfaces, withdrawal workflows, cloud security, network exposure, and software-supply-chain controls.

The details: - The engagement identified 27 findings: 2 high severity, 5 medium, 17 low and 3 informational. - softstack and the Edel Finance engineering team remediated 25 findings and independently verified the fixes. - The remaining two low-severity findings were formally accepted as residual risk. - The final status left 0 open findings at the conclusion of the engagement. - The assessment used manual security testing, source-code-assisted analysis, infrastructure inspection and automated security tools. - Across eight testing phases, softstack performed 36 distinct security tests and examined 83 API endpoints. - The assessment confirmed that critical trading authorization controls and the tested financial transaction flows operated correctly in the development environment. - The two high-severity findings involved vulnerable software dependencies and an AI-agent-related prompt-injection risk within the Model Context Protocol integration. - Edel Finance’s engineering team merged 23 remediation pull requests during the engagement. - The final re-test confirmed 25 findings fixed and verified, 2 findings formally accepted as residual risk, and 0 remaining open findings. - Both high-severity findings were successfully remediated.

Between the lines: - The biggest issue was not a failure of core trading logic, but the broader attack surface around modern financial infrastructure, including APIs, cloud configuration and AI-agent tooling. - The result suggests the project team treated security as a development-cycle task rather than a one-time audit. - The focus on a grey-box test means the assessment balanced realistic attacker conditions with access to internal context.

What’s next: - Edel Finance can use the verified fixes and residual-risk decisions as a baseline for future hardening work. - softstack’s findings point to the need for continued testing as the trading stack, integrations and AI features evolve. - The companies presented the engagement as evidence that independent security reviews can be folded into ongoing product development rather than added after launch.

The bottom line: - Edel Finance’s futures infrastructure finished the review with no open findings, including closure of both high-severity issues.

Disclaimer: This article was produced by AGP Wire with the assistance of artificial intelligence based on original source content and has been refined to improve clarity, structure, and readability. This content is provided on an “as is” basis. While care has been taken in its preparation, it may contain inaccuracies or omissions, and readers should consult the original source and independently verify key information where appropriate. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, investment, or other professional advice.

Sign up for:

Global Finance Herald

The daily local news briefing you can trust. Every day. Subscribe now.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms & Conditions.

Share this page:

Advanced Search Options

Search for:

Search scope:

Type:

Search in:

Date range:

The last

Sort by:

Sign up for:

Global Finance Herald

The daily local news briefing you can trust. Every day. Subscribe now.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms & Conditions.